 | | Re: Art and Property ZRights —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) Some art is intended to create an intellectual response, not emotional, or as an aid to meditation (Mark Rothko's "glowing squares"), or.... (...) Each will assign their own unique value. (...) When Libertarians are the majority party, I'll (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Art and Property ZRights —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Start worrying. We are. If you go by sentiment, anyway. (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Art and Property ZRights —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yowza! Sort of, maybe, but I don't think that too many of that majority think its goals are currently realistic, for some of the reasons already addressed in the various Libertopia posts! Dave! (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Art and Property ZRights —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | (...) Then call a vote on it in congress while you can! :-) Bruce (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Art and Property ZRights —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) Yah. Right. Show me election results and appropriate laws, then. Maybe you want to dilute your viewpoint to the point where it is acceptable to enough people that you can have a good share of votes, just like the two major parties, but it (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Art and Property ZRights —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) You may have a point there, although I would argue that is still an emotional response. (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
