To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3291
3290  |  3292
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:15:14 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@novera*ihatespam*.com
Viewed: 
2232 times
  
Jasper Janssen wrote:

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 04:34:07 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:

Jasper, you need to reject this notion that the state somehow is able to
engineer anything successfully, and therefore has a claim on the
property of the citizens for nebulous "good things". As long as you
cling to it, we're going to trip over it over and over. Try to refute me
on my own terms, like you said you would, or just give it up, hmm?

In other words, "neener neener, I can't hear you?"

No, in other words, you're not moving this discussion forward because
you're not doing what you committed to do, accept my premise and try to
refute this particular point using it.

We have a fundamental disagreement about rights. I happen to be right
and you happen to be wrong. At least that's my view and I feel I've
amply demonstrated it in past threads. Rehashing it is not going to go
anywhere useful. I thought you already agreed you'd try to do some
rights based analysis to see where it gets you.

You seem to have gone back on that. That's fine but rehashing old ground
is tiresome for me.

Whatever.

Whatever indeed. Move the discussion forward or give up.

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) For one thing, I did not commit to refuting this particular point within your basic premise. That was another thread. For another, I said there that I would accept your basic premise that "all rights are property rights" You're trying to turn (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) In other words, "neener neener, I can't hear you?" Whatever. Jasper (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR