Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:58:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2020 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 04:34:07 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:
> Jasper, you need to reject this notion that the state somehow is able to
> engineer anything successfully, and therefore has a claim on the
> property of the citizens for nebulous "good things". As long as you
> cling to it, we're going to trip over it over and over. Try to refute me
> on my own terms, like you said you would, or just give it up, hmm?
In other words, "neener neener, I can't hear you?"
Whatever.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) No, in other words, you're not moving this discussion forward because you're not doing what you committed to do, accept my premise and try to refute this particular point using it. We have a fundamental disagreement about rights. I happen to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) And thank goodness he WASN'T state funded. Free money spoils people. If you don't want to suffer a bit for your art, you're not much of an artist, now are you? Note, that's a utilitarian argument against state funding... the art it produces is (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
