Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 04:49:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2167 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> Free money spoils people. If you don't want to suffer a bit for your art,
> you're not much of an artist, now are you?
>
> Note, that's a utilitarian argument against state funding... the art it
> produces is crud. But that's not my main argument, which is, and you
> know it already, that the artist does not have any claims to my property
> that I don't grant him.
Hear, Hear!!! Time to vote. Who is in favor of un-funding all federal art
subsidies?? It sure gets my vote. I prefer starving artists who have to work
a little bit at their trade and thus, create much better art.
If private individuals wish to contribute to artists I have no complaint but
when taxpayers are forced to pay for art and artists that may be
undeserving then it is time to stop the liberal, beauracratic money train
before it can leave the (metro)station.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Salm
....I shouldn't post this because I do not care to argue this issue, but I sure
do agree with the Libertarian view here.........
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| Although I agree with Kevin (how could I not, he's agreeing with me) I am honor bound to point out: (...) that the starving artists I see on TV (you know, on those 1/2 hour ads and such) seem to produce mostly Elvis on velvet... :-) Not that there's (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) I disagree with the sentiment that suffering creates better art, or that worthy art can only be created by those willing to suffer a bit for it. Are some of the amazing LEGO creations and sculptures on LUGNET not examples of worthy art created (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) And thank goodness he WASN'T state funded. Free money spoils people. If you don't want to suffer a bit for your art, you're not much of an artist, now are you? Note, that's a utilitarian argument against state funding... the art it produces is (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
