To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3105
3104  |  3106
Subject: 
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 20:31:38 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@SPAMLESSuswest.net
Viewed: 
1688 times
  
John DiRienzo wrote:

Jasper Janssen wrote in message <38830931.919200318@lugnet.com>...
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 19:30:52 GMT, John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net>
wrote:

I hope it does.  It seems to be a more mature (in terms of societal • evolution)
system of government.  Anarchy would be the most mature, IMO.

Either you're nuts, or you havent read your history books.

Remember what Europe was like when anarchy ruled? Think medieval times
in between Charlemagne, William the Conqueror, etc.. It was _not_ fun.
Even less so than with great dictators.

A societal system needs to be stable to survive. Anarchy is not
statically stable, but it's also not even dynamically stable.

Jasper

   I had to think about what John said for a day or two to know what he
meant.  I am still not sure if I took it the right way, but I don't think he
is nuts.  I think he is saying (and I would agree, if he is) that the
society that could function properly without any form of government would
consist of the most evolved people possible (his words were "most mature in
terms of societal evolution").  In a way, he is saying (well, I am, anyway)
that once human beings (as a society) become fully evolved, there will be no
need for any government whatsoever.

You are correct, John.

I don't believe people are anywhere
near (and have no way of knowing if they could ever reach) that state of
evolution.  I tend to believe anarchy will never work, because although
humans will always evolve,

Never say never(;), but I'm with you in thinking that we as a race aren't
anywhere near that state.

I doubt they will actually evolve to perfection -
I see that as similar to counting to infiniti.

I believe that existence after death will be on a higher plane, although I know
not how or even care really.  What matters is the here and now and making this
existence the best it can be for everyone.

-John


--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/

"Censorship is yet another tool in the dumbing-down of America
by a power structure that relies on a populace too lazy or ignorant
to think independently." -Vanessa McGrady



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
John Neal wrote in message <386E6426.576F7583@u...st.net>... (...) he (...) in (...) anyway) (...) no (...) know (...) this (...) I don't pretend to know anything about any here after. Perhaps there is one, but it makes about as much difference to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) Either you're nuts, or you havent read your history books. Remember what Europe was like when anarchy ruled? Think medieval times in between Charlemagne, William the Conqueror, etc.. It was _not_ fun. Even less so than with great dictators. A (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR