To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3104
3103  |  3105
Subject: 
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 19:24:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1350 times
  
James Brown wrote in message ...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
James Brown wrote:

Anything based on morals (which "good" typically is) IS subjective, and can
never be anything else, at least until God (in whatever guise you like,
assuming you believe in Him) provides us with an absolute morality.(1)
Neither you nor I can ever be certain how said sociopath is acting in • relation
to his morality.

   In what guise would you expect Him?  Could it not happen that someone
could formulate their (and His) idea of good, put it into practice, and then
people see that it works?!  I think that is much more likely than hearing
the heavens talk.

That being said, however:  "Good" can also be a societal (or ethical) term • as
well.  I find good & evil to be too strong to use when trying to define • things
as a group, though - right and wrong work better.  IMHO, calling someone • evil
is going to get a stronger reaction than calling someone wrong - and it • also
implies more judgement of person than judgement of action.

   Sure, good and evil are stronger words than right and wrong.  Evil is
connotated with judgment moreso than wrong, but perhaps judgment is under
rated.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/

"Censorship is yet another tool in the dumbing-down of America
by a power structure that relies on a populace too lazy or ignorant
to think independently." -Vanessa McGrady



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) So 'good' is "what works"? That's cultural Darwinism. It's also moral relativism, whether you like it or not. Because "what works" is a very large range of things - and it changes over time. In Sparta, what worked best was to leave unwanted (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) Anything based on morals (which "good" typically is) IS subjective, and can never be anything else, at least until God (in whatever guise you like, assuming you believe in Him) provides us with an absolute morality.(1) Neither you nor I can (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR