Subject:
|
Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Dec 1998 14:31:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
766 times
|
| |
|
|
Matt Marshall wrote:
>
> The thing is not about sex, but it isn't about what you say it is, it is
> about Starr getting more power and a conspiracy(1) I mean who tells there
> mom, Mom stick this dress in the back of the closet make sure you never
> clean it and oh, well don't think about those stains, then leaves it there
> for a year and suddenly it pops up just in time. Not to mention that Starr
> actully went outside the bounds of his investigation without approval until
> a month after he had circumstantila evidence.
Ken Starr is a good man... I never used to believe this, but because of
him, the eyes of the American people have been opened *WIDE*...
This is not a conspiracy, the conspiracy was committed by the opposite
side. And quite frankly, I'm sick of (pardon me) people like you, who I
like to call "future lawyers," trying to help shitballs hide behind the
constitution. (or justify it, somehow) The president did wrong
repeatedly, and no matter what this trial is or was about, it is high
noon for Mr. Clinton.
Ken Starr did his job, and nothing more. He is one of the few in our
gov't who has actually done us some good... that is, to help us see what
we let go on... if people are too blind to see it, that only professes
the evil in their hearts... how you could condone Clinton's actions
falls right in line with his lack of morality, and his sick antics. Why
don't we all just see who the bad guy really is, here?
and when did Ken Starr tell his mom to stick the dress in the back of
the closet? (prove conspiracy before you cry wolf - I believe Ken Starr
knew this wouldn't make him popular... he was doing a job nobody else
wanted, for pretty obvious reasons)
>
> (1) Yes I said conspiracy, and it was I mean someone saves a dress for a
> year, and Paula Jones didn't know why she was invited to a sleazy hotel on
> the outskirts of town where several hookers had been busted before.
> Matt Marshall
> $%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!!
> Matt's Lego Page
> http://rapturesoft.hypermart.net/mlego/
You don't know the story behind that dress any more than you know if
you'll be alive tomorrow. I think it's silly, but it *is* real, and
whether it be to propagate some sick fantasy of Ms. Lewinsky, or just
because it wasn't dry cleaned, is irrelevant. If that DNA matches that
of Clinton, he has had his no-no in the wrong place, end of story.
(unless that dress was Hillary's, and that's just sick to think about)
And as for the Jones case, you evidently didn't get the whole story...
it is alleged that she was more than just casually "invited."
I can't believe you can't see the pattern of behavior... It's scary what
people will support these days.. You should give Mr. Starr a round of
applause. His work might have been expensive, but I think of it as a
good long-term investment.
--
=======================================================================
"What would you do with a brain if you had one?"
- Dorothy (from The Wizard of OZ)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remove "NO SPAM" when replying.
ICQ #11674715
=======================================================================
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| Matt Hanson <"mth8358"@NO SPAMwichita.infi.net> > wrote in message ... (...) there (...) Starr (...) until (...) No, any american who listned to the press, which had already tried and convicted him, already new he did the dirty with lewinsky, and (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <367D3775.E8CC6DCC@c...AM.com>... (...) True very true, ecspeccialy in California (...) Lewinksy I thought happened at the smae time he testified (...) Clinton has moral courage, I mean who could stand up to 250 (...) (26 years ago, 23-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
