Subject:
|
Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Dec 1998 02:00:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
657 times
|
| |
|
|
Matt Hanson <"mth8358"@NO SPAMwichita.infi.net> > wrote in message ...
>
>
> Matt Marshall wrote:
> >
> > The thing is not about sex, but it isn't about what you say it is, it is
> > about Starr getting more power and a conspiracy(1) I mean who tells there
> > mom, Mom stick this dress in the back of the closet make sure you never
> > clean it and oh, well don't think about those stains, then leaves it • there
> > for a year and suddenly it pops up just in time. Not to mention that • Starr
> > actully went outside the bounds of his investigation without approval • until
> > a month after he had circumstantila evidence.
>
>
>
> Ken Starr is a good man... I never used to believe this, but because of
> him, the eyes of the American people have been opened *WIDE*...
No, any american who listned to the press, which had already tried and
convicted him, already new he did the dirty with lewinsky, and probaly
others. He lied to protect his family. Ken Starr was the one who put him on
the spot, and it was Starrs responsability to investigate WhiteWater, now if
I remeber whitewater had nothing to do with sex. If starr opened your eyes
wide open well then you must have been keeping them shut along with your
ears.
>
> This is not a conspiracy, the conspiracy was committed by the opposite
> side. And quite frankly, I'm sick of (pardon me) people like you, who I
> like to call "future lawyers," trying to help shitballs hide behind the
> constitution. (or justify it, somehow) The president did wrong
> repeatedly, and no matter what this trial is or was about, it is high
> noon for Mr. Clinton.
>
> Ken Starr did his job, and nothing more. He is one of the few in our
> gov't who has actually done us some good... that is, to help us see what
> we let go on... if people are too blind to see it, that only professes
> the evil in their hearts... how you could condone Clinton's actions
> falls right in line with his lack of morality, and his sick antics. Why
> don't we all just see who the bad guy really is, here?
He did everything to get his name in the press and move up the washington
power ladder. he spent ton's of money flying all over the country
investigating a entirely unrelated issue, not whitewater which he was
supposed to investigate. Not to mention I'd place even money that Ken Starr
had probaly lied, had sex with interns of his and done more stuff than
Clinton. And what is the diffrenc between lying and lying in front of a
judge?
> and when did Ken Starr tell his mom to stick the dress in the back of
> the closet? (prove conspiracy before you cry wolf - I believe Ken Starr
> knew this wouldn't make him popular... he was doing a job nobody else
> wanted, for pretty obvious reasons)
Lewinsky told her mom, Ken Starr didn't care if it made him popular with the
voters, I mean very few politicians do, until election year. A lot of people
wanted this job not just him
>
> >
> > (1) Yes I said conspiracy, and it was I mean someone saves a dress for a
> > year, and Paula Jones didn't know why she was invited to a sleazy hotel • on
> > the outskirts of town where several hookers had been busted before.
> > Matt Marshall
> > $%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!!
> > Matt's Lego Page
> > http://rapturesoft.hypermart.net/mlego/
>
>
> You don't know the story behind that dress any more than you know if
> you'll be alive tomorrow. I think it's silly, but it *is* real, and
> whether it be to propagate some sick fantasy of Ms. Lewinsky, or just
> because it wasn't dry cleaned, is irrelevant. If that DNA matches that
> of Clinton, he has had his no-no in the wrong place, end of story.
> (unless that dress was Hillary's, and that's just sick to think about)
well considering that lewinsky said she told her mom to hide it..... As I
said before I'm sure that Starr had his no-no in the wrong places to.
> And as for the Jones case, you evidently didn't get the whole story...
> it is alleged that she was more than just casually "invited."
So, she still knew why she was being invited, and yet she chose to go
> I can't believe you can't see the pattern of behavior... It's scary what
> people will support these days.. You should give Mr. Starr a round of
> applause. His work might have been expensive, but I think of it as a
> good long-term investment.
I see a pattern where people are trying to get more power anyway possible,
I'll give starr a round of appluase when he gives us all the money he wasted
on this stupid investigation. There is a diffrenc between expensive and
what-a-godwaful-waste-of-money. I thinks it's around 2 million on somthing
that mosta mericans think has no impact on his job.
>
>
> --
> =======================================================================
> "What would you do with a brain if you had one?"
>
> - Dorothy (from The Wizard of OZ)
Nice quote, glad I'd seen your other posts before this, almost thought it
was an insult, of course it can be applied to Starr and 90% of congress.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Remove "NO SPAM" when replying.
>
> ICQ #11674715
> =======================================================================
Matt Marshall
$%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!!
Matt's Lego Page
http://rapturesoft.hypermart.net/mlego/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| (...) Ken Starr's job was to dig up dirt on Clinton. In doing so, he may have changed the focus from the matter at hand to the present matter. No problem with me, I want the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth. If the guy is a sleaze (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| A lot of people have been debating the impeachment issue here. I have an opinion, but because I am lazy, I am going to re-post something that I wrote for another discussion group. There are a couple of references to people who are members of that (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| (...) Ken Starr is a good man... I never used to believe this, but because of him, the eyes of the American people have been opened *WIDE*... This is not a conspiracy, the conspiracy was committed by the opposite side. And quite frankly, I'm sick (...) (26 years ago, 23-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
