Subject:
|
Re: Meta Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:48:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7689 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Adrian Egli wrote:
A good question! For certain, RTL did not make a comeback. The theory I’ve
heard is the growth of theme group sites like Classic Space outside of Lugnet
have drawn readers away from Lugnet.
I always admired Lugnet for avoiding advertising - think how much it could have
raked in during its peak traffic days! It just seems a bit mercenary to fracture
a community to make a few bucks, after all the work that went into fostering the
LEGO community that happened here.. but that’s business I guess.
I’ve also heard people express the opinion
that Lugnet is “outdated” in terms of its web format, style, etc. (Anyone for
Lugnet on a BB/iPhone/cell phone format???)
Is the Lugnet code under GPL or something? I found
this thread
discussing the possibility, but nothing else.
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Meta Question
|
| (...) --snip-- (...) I'm not exactly sure that anyone has attempted to start a new site 'to make a few bucks'. I have my doubts that anyone even could. I believe the first offshoot sites were started due to disagreements about the running and format (...) (16 years ago, 17-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Meta Question
|
| (...) A good question! For certain, RTL did not make a comeback. The theory I've heard is the growth of theme group sites like Classic Space outside of Lugnet have drawn readers away from Lugnet. I've also heard people express the opinion that (...) (16 years ago, 14-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
