Subject:
|
Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:20:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6393 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
snip
| |
I think I will go make an abstract painting that represents my
disillusionment with you both! Or I may have my untrained monkey do it for
me.
Janey “If MY monkey painted it, it IS art, Red Brick”
|
So if you had an infinite number of monkeys flinging an infinite amount of
monkey-poo around, would you get a picasso?
One wonders...
Dave K
|
NO dave,
Everyone knows with an infinite number of monkeys you get the works of
Shakespear.
NOT Picasso.
Once again, proving that Janey, and her monkey abstract art is NOT art. but
really, just a pile of monkey SH-- (1)
Chris
1. not at all unlike real abstract art.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote: snip (...) So if you had an infinite number of monkeys flinging an infinite amount of monkey-poo around, would you get a picasso? One wonders... Dave K (17 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
