To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28602
28601  |  28603
Subject: 
Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:20:47 GMT
Viewed: 
6634 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:


snip


  
I think I will go make an abstract painting that represents my disillusionment with you both! Or I may have my untrained monkey do it for me.

Janey “If MY monkey painted it, it IS art, Red Brick”

So if you had an infinite number of monkeys flinging an infinite amount of monkey-poo around, would you get a picasso?

One wonders...

Dave K

NO dave,

Everyone knows with an infinite number of monkeys you get the works of Shakespear.

NOT Picasso.

Once again, proving that Janey, and her monkey abstract art is NOT art. but really, just a pile of monkey SH-- (1)

Chris

1. not at all unlike real abstract art.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote: snip (...) So if you had an infinite number of monkeys flinging an infinite amount of monkey-poo around, would you get a picasso? One wonders... Dave K (17 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

13 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR