To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28300
28299  |  28301
Subject: 
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:13:33 GMT
Viewed: 
4904 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
   It may come as a shock, but posting in a public forum invites a response from anyone who reads it, no matter who you reply to.

I disagree. Posting publically invites public readership, but not necessarily public participation. I think only an invitation insures this.

JOHN

I completely disagree with this. By posting in a public forum you are inviting other participants of that forum to your discussion.

Not necessarily. Sure, anyone who is a member is free to read and respond to any given post, but unless there is a “comments welcome”or “LMKYT”, for example, responses aren’t solicited. When I post a MOC, I do not do so in order to receive feedback. Simply sharing and participating in the community is reward in and of itself.

This reminds me of a noob a while back who posted some things and was miffed and hurt that his posts weren’t commented upon. I remember thinking, “if you want feedback, you should ask for it.” And conversely, if comments aren’t solicited, then they aren’t necessary desired.

   You can take it to email if you don’t want public responses. To post publically and not expect response is, in my opinion, the height of bad manners, it’s like shouting a conversation in a busy room but demanding everyone else ignores it.

I didn’t say “expected”; I said solicited. Of course I’m not surprised when people chime in, but I don’t expect responses to posts for which I haven’t asked.

JOHN



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) I may have missed it, but I don't think you actually said 'solicited' in the post to which Tim was responding. Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Is this the five minute argument, or the full half hour? (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) I still disagree. By posting in a public forum you are, in my opinion, soliciting and inviting response. If you do not wish response, or if you wish only certain people to respond you should either not post or take it to email. (...) I agree (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Hmmm. I wonder if (URL) Dave feels the same way>? ROSCO (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) I completely disagree with this. By posting in a public forum you are inviting other participants of that forum to your discussion. You can take it to email if you don't want public responses. To post publically and not expect response is, in (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR