To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28138
28137  |  28139
Subject: 
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:28:19 GMT
Viewed: 
3068 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

snip

  
   http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070123.wxarar23/BNStory/National/home

I’m glad *some* senators are calling it what it is--

“Demogoguery”?


Speaking of Demogoguery...

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/01/24/chuck-hagel-on-fire/

Oh wait, he’s a Republican. I guess his speechifying can’t be considered that.

As an aside, I agree with everything Hagel stated and consider him a man of class. I don’t think he was pontificating for the sake of scoring political points. Nor did I think that Sen. Leahy was doing same. However, John might disagree...

If Hagel votes “yay” for this silly and pointless non-binding resolution, republicans will throw him under the bus, gahr-un-teed. And that goes for ANY senator with an R after their name. Even HE knows it, as evidenced by his own questioning of the viability of his political career by taking his “stand”.

Why is it silly, in your view? And what does it say about Republicans in general that they’re willing to oust someone who expresses an opinion that didn’t come from the party’s marching orders?

Lately Repubs have claimed to have a larger tent than Democrats, on the grounds that Repubs allegedly tolerate a wider range of views than do the Dems. Well, we’ll see how big the “R” tent remains after Senators start voicing their displeasure with Bush’s policies.

Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Resolve for the war is sacred. Don't underestimate the passion for this issue. All others pale in comparison. (...) Not on THIS issue. As far as silly goes; come'on, what is the point of "non-binding" resolutions? Let the Dems stop playing (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) If Hagel votes "yay" for this silly and pointless non-binding resolution, republicans will throw him under the bus, gahr-un-teed. And that goes for ANY senator with an R after their name. Even HE knows it, as evidenced by his own questioning (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR