 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Hard to say, honestly. I've been giving this some more thought, and it seems to me that a necessary component of rebellion is a desire to break from the targeted nation (or break from some or all of its policies) without necessarily requiring (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) The ostensible goal of Al Quadea is to create an international Islamic State by force. Since this would involve overturning the policies of nations and the acts of terror are (ostensibly) designed to create a situation in which this can happen (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Yup. (...) Yes. And why I think Specter was being obtuse. (...) And not nearly enough "John's":-) JOHN (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) If that's true, then the appropriate course of action must be to err on the side of preserving liberty. Instead, in the fear-soaked aftermath of 9/11, we saw the Congress tripping over itself in its abdicate its Constitutional responsibility, (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
