Subject:
|
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:38:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2778 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
One problem there (among many) is that there has been no invasion and no
rebellion. A single attack does not an invasion make, so there is literally
no justification for suspension of habeas corpus.
|
“Single attack”? Do you forget (among many others) the first bombing at the
WTC, Dave!?
Maybe this debate needs to begin with the idea of whether or not we are at war.
Are we?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) Of course not--RW radio mentions it daily, every time they blame Clinton for 9/11. (...) Okay, so two attacks in a decade constitute an invasion? Sorry, but "invasion" implies the insertion of a substantial military presence into the target (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
