Subject:
|
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:24:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2853 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
|
Hmmmm, founding fathers being exclusionary? The literal text really does
say what Gonzales says it does.
But then again, the literal text of the 2nd really does say that the guns
are for the well oiled militia
Interpretations be damned, I say. Lets go for the literal text!!!
|
Well, you want your interpretation, and literal, too. Specter takes the
Constitution literally when he cites except in the case of invasion or
rebellion, but when Gonzales takes the Constitution literally, you cry foul.
|
One problem there (among many) is that there has been no invasion and no
rebellion. A single attack does not an invasion make, so there is literally no
justification for suspension of habeas corpus.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
115 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|