To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28110
28109  |  28111
Subject: 
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:31:17 GMT
Viewed: 
2923 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

  
   Hmmmm, founding fathers being exclusionary? The literal text really does say what Gonzales says it does.

But then again, the literal text of the 2nd really does say that the guns are for the ‘well oiled militia’

Interpretations be damned, I say. Let’s go for the literal text!!!

Well, you want your interpretation, and literal, too. Specter takes the Constitution literally when he cites “except in the case of invasion or rebellion”, but when Gonzales takes the Constitution literally, you cry foul.

One problem there (among many) is that there has been no invasion and no rebellion. A single attack does not an invasion make, so there is literally no justification for suspension of habeas corpus.

Dave!

A single attack can make a rebellion if it is by a citizen of the country. I can’t remember if any of the Sept 11 bombers were US citizens but if so I would argue it indeed was a part of a rebellion.

Tim



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) It's pretty sketchy. You could define "rebellion" as a group of citizens who take action against the government. But does that action necessarily require that it's an armed action, or a physically destructive one? What if they were hacking in (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Sorry, Tim--I missed your post, or I would have responded earlier. DaveE has already offered good thoughts on this point, but I'd go in a slightly different direction. In my view, a rebellion necessarily consists of a viably large body of (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) One problem there (among many) is that there has been no invasion and no rebellion. A single attack does not an invasion make, so there is literally no justification for suspension of habeas corpus. Dave! (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR