|
|
 | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) <<chuckle>> I have been away for a while. So I kinda walked into this one on the strength of the subject. Silly me. Can't imagine why atheists would care whether there was some bloke called Jesus padding about 2,000 years ago. Must remember to (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) I suspect that Jason Robards won't be starring in the film version of this one, though. (...) That's not always unreasonable, except when the necessary disproof is so burdensome that it becomes practically impossible. If I asserted that my (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Agreed. Kinda like the Scopes trial in reverse;-) (...) He sets up a classic error-- he has so-called proofs that he has written about that Jesus didn't exist-- he claims it is up to the other side to prove him wrong. (...) Even moreso the (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) I'm surprised that this is going to court, honestly. How can you prove that someone didn't exist ~2000 years ago? The best you can do, IMO, is show that the evidence doesn't support the conclusion that he existed. AFAIC, the Gospels are (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Heads up, atheists
|
| (URL) Finally we shall soon learn the Truth> JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
