Subject:
|
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 06:09:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2498 times
|
| |
|
|
OK, let me clarify - at NO time publicly has TLC stated anything about Brickshelf,
and Kevin has repeatedly mentioned he hasn't heard from TLC. Yet by Richard's Holy
Rule, since TLC has said nothing about posting instruction scans, and posting them
is OBVIOUSLY wrong, that means that Brickshelf is a naughty boy, and should be
excised/banished/excommunicated. And if you can't see the sarcasm/humor in that, I
give up.
I could care less about what TLC has said to you in private, Todd, because you've
kept it private (I'm actually assuming they HAVE talked to you in private quite a
few times) for good reason, I'd assume. You have posted tidbits here and there,
but not much.
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> writes:
> > [...] AT NO TIME has TLC said yea or nay on Brickshelf ot Lugnet scans. [...]
>
> You sound pretty sure of that.
>
> --Todd
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
