Debate : 2742


Off-Topic / Debate / 2742	2741 \| 2743

Subject:	Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 05:45:03 GMT
Viewed:	2175 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> writes: > [...] AT NO TIME has TLC said yea or nay on Brickshelf ot Lugnet scans. [...] You sound pretty sure of that. --Todd

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
OK, let me clarify - at NO time publicly has TLC stated anything about Brickshelf, and Kevin has repeatedly mentioned he hasn't heard from TLC. Yet by Richard's Holy Rule, since TLC has said nothing about posting instruction scans, and posting them (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

		Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
(...) Well, if he's wrong then say so. I distinctly remember Kevin on numerous occasions mentioning something to the extent of "well, the less attention we make TLG pay to the scans site the better" - basically, like in the case of the loser selling (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
(...) You don't? OK, we'd better shut down Brickshelf and Lugnet. RIGHT NOW. Because Richard says that since TLC hasn't told us not to, it's NOT OK, so all of Kevin/Todd's scans have to go. Take them down. Richard says so. If you can't see the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search