Subject:
|
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 06:27:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2369 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> writes:
> > [...] AT NO TIME has TLC said yea or nay on Brickshelf ot Lugnet scans. [...]
>
> You sound pretty sure of that.
Well, if he's wrong then say so.
I distinctly remember Kevin on numerous occasions mentioning
something to the extent of "well, the less attention we make TLG pay
to the scans site the better" - basically, like in the case of the
loser selling the cd full of copies instructions, saying "they
haven't said we can't do it - so let's not bring up a lot of
attention for this sort of thing that might make them want to."
If you and/or Kevin have receive explicit permission to host all the
various and sundry bits of Lego intellectual property you host, by
all means, say so and we'll eat a little bit of crow.
But don't think that everyone in the world is going to interpret "we
have no problem with you doing this" as "but if Huw posts
low-quality scans of sets we're going to release in catalogs in a
couple weeks we'd be really mad." :)
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
