Debate : 2738


Off-Topic / Debate / 2738	2737 \| 2739

Subject:	Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 02:09:20 GMT
Viewed:	2283 times

Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospam__yahoo.com> wrote: > I ask you honestly - is there a possibility that you are using the fact that > TLC will most probably not answer you to justify doing something that they > probably wouldn't like and could hurt the community? And I ask YOU honestly, isn't the fact that TLC hasn't said anything about other things on other fan sites taken as implicit permission to do them? What's the difference? I'll be happy to eat crow if some TLC official makes a statement about this, but until then, I'm not going to accept anyone else's intepretation of these nice steamy entrails over mine. > I have no problem with being wrong, it's useful to expect that from time to > time. But when I know that I could be wrong I would not risk something like > hurting TLC-FOL relations, without good reason - and "Mummy didn't tell me not > to paint the dog blue" is not an excuse to do it! It's an excuse to do other things, though. As for TLC-AFOL relations, the only relations I see are the AFOLs spending money on TLC's products and having ... none? of their ideas/requests/offers given any consideration at all. -- The parts you want and nothing else? http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free! http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
(...) In my opinion? Certainly not! Grudging permission, tolerance maybe. But then it is not the charter of pause and brickshelf to contain company secrets. I really don't understand this "They haven't told us not to, so it's okay" attitude! (...) (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

		Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
(...) Does this imply that your steamy entrails are not nice? Or that your entrails are not nice and steamy? ;-) (for the clue impared) Chris (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
(...) What do you think they will say, bearing in mind that these are secret, not for public use documents? Hearing the phrase "pastel = profit" from a 1993 retailers catalogue may seem funny or harmless. But it makes me dislike the girly LEGO even (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search