 | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) You anti-Semitic troll! The fact that Sharon is a wanted war criminal should reassure us all that Israel has the moral authority to hold nukes (1) any intimidate its neighbours! Scott A 1As a belligerent nation which has no respect of (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Pot? Kettle. JOHN (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) ....do you care to expand that, or is it just more ugly unjustified name calling? Scott A (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) No. (...) On your part? Yes. JOHN (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) **sigh** Scott A (...) (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Sorry to disappoint-- but we've already beaten that corpse to China and back. :-) JOHN (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Do you care to give us all a link to this alleged beating? Scott A (...) (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Just one? What are you, like Dory from "Finding Nemo"? JOHN (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | Let's forget Finding Nemo and face facts john. You got a little annoyed about what I said with regard to Israel. However, as I was telling the truth, all you could do was engage in pointless and unjustified name calling. GET A LIFE. Scott A (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Fine, fair friend. (...) Not said. "Say". (...) <hands over ears> LA LA LA LA LA LA LA! (...) It wasn't pointless. (...) Now you seem annoyed. Let's call it even. JOHN (19 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) Unjustified, maybe, but certainly not pointless... ROSCO (19 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | (...) Now there is an argument, and close to the best possible riposte under all the circumstances, I think. Seems to sum up Larry and John perfectly in this case. Richard Still baldly going... (19 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | (...) Of all the names I have ever been called (I keep a list of the best as a check on hubris), this one is probably the best. It can't go on the list because you're not serious, but I love it anyway :-) Maybe I'll write it on the back... Richard (...) (19 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Well spotted. I suppose I get tired of people in the media who objectively question Israeli nationalism either: (a) being called anti-Semitic (why is this worse than other, more prevalent, forms of racism?) or (b) being reminded of the (...) (19 years ago, 9-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Hmm... Then you were probably kidding when you called me a (URL) holocaust denying anti-Semite>, too. (...) Hey, those kids were asking for it. They knew that they were Palestinians when they left their homes--what did they expect would (...) (19 years ago, 9-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Sorry. That should have been "Holocaust-denying-a...c-liberal" :-) (...) Yep. Life is tough when you are cannon fodder for the IDF. Scott A (...) (19 years ago, 10-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) That's better! (...) Or when you've committed the horrible crime of being an Iraqi civilian, for example. Dave! (19 years ago, 10-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
