 | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) Yeah? Bummer - I only ever played about with it for about half an hour before, and I found it miraculous to effortlessly load msword docs on my solaris box at work! Not that I needed to of course, as all the documentation I did was in (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) Well, noting that I'm speaking mostly as a channel for other people since I have little experience myself: It leaks memory worse than Netscape 4, it crashes more often than Win98, and the user interface sucks (according to those who're forced (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | | (...) In other words it combines the most widely discussed features of the most common software packages of our time. Those words being marketing-speak. (...) I wouldn't expect it to be better... yet! :) Richard (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) With enough memory (all my machines have at least 256, and that's enough) I'd rather run Linux and VMWare+NT and Office 2000 than Linux and StarOffice any day. Maybe if S.O. didn't suck I would feel differently, but I'll put up with the lags (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) The fact that it runs like crap is the biggest part of it. I also don't like the all-in-one interface. Its user interface feels like an old off-bran Works-type program. And I don't think it will qualify as an alternative to MS Office for a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | |
