 | | Re: Excellent news! —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Thanks. Resume kicking position:-) (...) Well, humans only live so long. I see little difference in a sentence of 40 years and one of 3 consecutive life sentences. I love it when someone becomes eligible for parole after a couple of hundred (...) (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Excellent news! —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) If you can prove that all confessions are 100% truthful. What if he's lying to protect his sister? Sure he probably deserves a penalty for lying about it, but the needle? ROSCO (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) That well may be, but my point was and is to try and address the moral issue of execution directly. Your post reminds me of that classic scene in "Mr. Mom" where Jack is using the "Rocky" analogy. "Which Rocky?" :-) JOHN (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, that's an important distinction to make, and I don't think that I was making it in our part of the thread. But let's make sure we're clear-- You're debating about the morality of execution itself (presumably in cases in which guilt is (...) (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. I was hoping to take one at a time. JOHN (...) (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Excellent news! —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Not sure where you are going with that since no one is going to live a couple of hundred years. (...) So we don't murder innocent people. (...) My point exactly. (...) How so? (...) No. There's lots of people who confess to crimes that they (...) (19 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, that's my point. These types of absurd sentences are given out anyway. (...) We do that anyway with our system that releases criminals on technicalities and those criminals go on to kill again. (...) I was trying to focus specifically on (...) (19 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) I believe the point of three consecutive life setences is so that if someone becomes eligible for parole, they would still have to serve the next consecutive sentence (used in states that do not have "Life without any possible parole" (...) (19 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
