Subject:
|
Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:16:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1613 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
| |
Anyhow, that silly Iran story is a sorta like a stale bigfoot
sighting. It already made the rounds and was rebuffed last week.
http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/001173.php
|
ROFL You compare the Guardian to a “supermarket tabloid” and then
use this junk to back your case.
|
Oops, you’re right. They aren’t scheduled to
switch to tabloid format until
2006. I stand corrected. Sorry, it seemed funny at the time.
Heh, love that wikipedia. Who knew
George Soros was involved with the Guardian?
Anyhow, do you really think the blogs are all junk? Over here,
the main stream media seems to have taken notice. The
junk got an
honorable mention from the
Washington Post.
Not my favorite paper, but it is telling.
Enjoy,
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
