Subject:
|
Re: Clark County, Ohio
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:34:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1025 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
I’m not sure I’d like to be on the receiving end of
this.
|
Ha! Would be interesting to see how many people from the UK would actually
go for Bush...
|
|
Judging by the mob which followed him on his last visit and the way he is almost
universally derided here: not very many.
| |
I think the question is more accurately stated “how many Guardian readers
would go for Bush?”... and I think we have our answer, (3) thanks to the cite
provided by Dave!
It would really be a shame if this clueless stunt (by a paper I have little
respect for, mind you) backfired and ended up swinging a swing county to Bush
and thus swinging the state to Bush, and thus swinging the election to Bush
so we were stuck with 4 more years of him.
|
That’s actually an argument against all political campagning. When I posted the
message I was actually more concerned about Clark County residients recieving
unsolicited mail from a country they probably counld’t find on the map... ;)
Scott A
| |
Perhaps this is all a nefarious plot, and the Guardian is either secretly in
the employ of the GOP, or desperate for an enemy so wants Bush to win? Na,
that’s too deep.
3 - this isn’t a footnote! (3) is the number of readers that went that way, I
expect.
|
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clark County, Ohio
|
| (...) I think the question is more accurately stated "how many Guardian readers would go for Bush?"... and I think we have our answer, (3) thanks to the cite provided by Dave! It would really be a shame if this clueless stunt (by a paper I have (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
