Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:21:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1478 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
| |
The way I read his original comment was that
despising LGBTs and their lifestyles is genetically built into humankind,
despite the fact that much of the modern world disproves his theory.
|
Specifically, the revulsion of heterosexuals by the idea of engaging in
homosexual sex.
|
You’ve asked them all, have you? I would say many heterosexuals would
probably have such revulsion, but I wouldn’t be arrogant enought to assume
they ALL do.
|
Well, the ones that didn’t I wouldn’t categorize as “heterosexual”, but as
“heterosexual with homosexual tendencies”, or some other such qualification.
|
Even if they are only attracted to women, and only sleep with women? There is
nothing in the definition of heterosexual that says you have to be REPULSED by
homosexuality.
How much “homosexual tendency” does a heterosexual have to have before you no
longer consider them heterosexual? What about heterosexuals that are forced to
live for long periods without access to the opposite sex (think prison)? How
many homosexual thoughts do they have before you no longer consider them
heterosexual? If they have homosexual relationships in prison, then go back to
heterosexual relationships on the outside but they no longer think homosexuality
is as bad as when they went in, do you still consider they have homosexual
tendencies?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) So, are you saying that heterosexuals in prison who engage in homosexual sex are still heterosexuals? This is an interesting distinction and I have heard it before among Latin men. They believe that they can have sex with a Gay man (they, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Well, the ones that didn't I wouldn't categorize as "heterosexual", but as "heterosexual with homosexual tendencies", or some other such qualification. JOHN (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
