Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:48:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1548 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
| |
The way I read his original comment was that
despising LGBTs and their lifestyles is genetically built into humankind,
despite the fact that much of the modern world disproves his theory.
|
Specifically, the revulsion of heterosexuals by the idea of engaging in
homosexual sex.
|
You’ve asked them all, have you? I would say many heterosexuals would
probably have such revulsion, but I wouldn’t be arrogant enought to assume
they ALL do.
|
Well, the ones that didn’t I wouldn’t categorize as “heterosexual”, but as
“heterosexual with homosexual tendencies”, or some other such qualification.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Even if they are only attracted to women, and only sleep with women? There is nothing in the definition of heterosexual that says you have to be REPULSED by homosexuality. How much "homosexual tendency" does a heterosexual have to have before (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) You've asked them all, have you? I would say many heterosexuals would probably have such revulsion, but I wouldn't be arrogant enought to assume they ALL do. ROSCO (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
