To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24575
24574  |  24576
Subject: 
Re: Fair use and allusion?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:28:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1241 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

   You are either not listening or being deliberately obtuse. We did not start a war with the people of Iraq; we simply deposed their oppressive government whom we perceived as a potential threat. We are fighting for Iraq, not against Iraq. Isn’t this obvious?

No. And the “no” answer should be obvious because clearly a great deal of the world clearly thinks it isn’t obvious.

“A great deal”?, or mostly France and Germany

Add to that the UK and a growing number of your own countrymen.

   (who had national interests in seeing SH remain in power-- at the expense of the Iraqi people).

...and Bush wanted to remove him at the expense of the Iraqi people.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Fair use and allusion?
 
(...) "A great deal"?, or mostly France and Germany (who had national interests in seeing SH remain in power-- at the expense of the Iraqi people). (...) I think everyone would agree that the free flow of oil is in the best interests of our country (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR