Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:14:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1126 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
No, what you can’t do is to defend the UN and ignore the stated
ramifications of violating Res 1441. The UN is impotent and useless.
|
Either you need to completely ignore Res. 1441 in justifying Bush’s Iraqi
War Redux, or you need to condemn Bush for not complying with the U.N.
|
I condemn the UN for not complying with the U.N.‘s own resolution!
|
It did.
| |
Empty
threats are meaningless and a joke.
|
Sure, let’s get rid of the veto. Lets go back and look at all the resolutions
against Israel. Would the NeoCons in Washington like that?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) "A great deal"?, or mostly France and Germany (who had national interests in seeing SH remain in power-- at the expense of the Iraqi people). (...) I think everyone would agree that the free flow of oil is in the best interests of our country (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
