To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24271
24270  |  24272
Subject: 
Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:02:12 GMT
Viewed: 
4096 times
  
John wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Thomas Stangl wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > John wrote:
> > 
> > > > As recently as three generations ago, the nuclear family as a self-contained
> > > > unit was newish.  I don't assume that the nuclear family is the ultimate
> > > > peak of social development.  I also don't believe that society is in any
> > > > meaningful way "built" upon the nuclear family.
> > > 
> > > Well, ours is, and so is Western Culture in general.
> > 
> > Really?  Do tell...
> 
> Take a look around.  I think you are denying the obvious.  What would {you}
> assert the foundation of our society is?

Judging by stats today?  The foundation is just as likely to be Divorce as it is to
be Marriage.  50% goes both ways, bub.



> > I don't exactly know what reality you live in anymore, John (if I ever did),
> > but I've got news for you - the Nuclear Family is a 20th C construct, and it
> > is falling by the wayside.  It is anything BUT the norm anymore.
> 
> I didn't say it was the norm, just the foundation.

The foundation of what?  {Your} idea of what the US should be?  Ignoring the fact
that it is a 20C construct?



> >  While the majority of familes
> > {might} meet your Perfect Family Mold, it's only a matter of time (I say might
> > because I am too lazy to look up the latest census figures).
> 
> I doubt it.  Cultures with strong, nuclear families will overtake ones that
> don't.  Look at Europe.  The Europeans, apparently, are too intellectual or
> secular or something to bother with procreating, and they are aging and
> f-f-fading away.  All that props up their census is imigration and the
> procreation of those immigrants (and now for the good news-- those immigrants
> are predominantly {Muslim}).  At this rate, Europe will be dominated by Muslims
> in 40 short years.

Dominated by Breeders, regardless of religious slant.  What a shame.  Hey! Let's
bury the earth in more people!  6+ billion isn't enough!

I'd like to see the rest of the world follow Europe for a few decades, maybe it
would get the population near a sustainable level.


> > > >  All organisms "control" their
> > > > destinies as much as they are able.
> > > 
> > > Pardon?  "Control"?  Animals have no control-- they are governed by instinct.
> > 
> > What an absolute load of BS.
> 
> What {does} govern animal behavior then, Tom?  Reason? Ethics? Religion?

Fear, pain, emotions.  Kind of like humans.  But saying that animals can't control
their instinct is a complete load of BS.  If you're stupid enough to believe that,
you're hopeless, and I'll stop beating my head against the Brick Wall of John's
Mentality.


> > > >  Why is it human, and not e.g. canine, to
> > > > suppress our "animal instincts"?
> > > 
> > > Animals {can't} suppress instinct.  We are able.
> > 
> > Even a lab rat can suppress instinct if given the right impetus.
> 
> A given impetus can stimulate a given instinct.  There is no reasoning going on
> in the head of a rat.

And I suppose there is zero reasoning going on in the heads of {other} primates
(we're primates, animals, remember?), nor in dolphins?



> > As usual, the vast majority of words coming out of your mouth in here stink of
> > bovine-digested-grasses.
> 
> Must be the sour cream and chives dip I ate....
> > 
> > > Honestly, I find this equivocation of humans and animals disturbing.  Say the
> > > last tiger alive on earth was attacking me and would indeed kill me if you
> > > didn't kill it first.  Would you?
> > 
> > It depends - would you also be the last other person in the world that I'd
> > have to talk to?  ;-)
> 
> You get my point.

Not really.  If there were, like now, 6+ billion people, and 1 tiger, and it was our
last chance of resurrecting tigers, and I didn't have a strong emotional bond to
you, I'd have to stop and think about it, most likely.

Placing a single human life above {everything} else with no regard is just
ridiculous.


--
Tom Stangl
*http://www.vfaq.com/
*DSM Visual FAQ home
*http://www.vfaq.net/
*Prius Visual FAQ Home



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) Take a look around. I think you are denying the obvious. What would you assert the foundation of our society is? (...) (snip) (...) I didn't say it was the norm, just the foundation. (...) I doubt it. Cultures with strong, nuclear families (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR