Subject:
|
Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 May 2004 20:17:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1358 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > That's an interesting assertion, though I'd have to differ. On what do you base
> > it?
>
> On the legal definition of insider trading as it stands, today, in the US.
> That's the last I'll say about it in this thread, start a new thread if you
> want.
Nah, not worth it. I think I misread your initial point anyway, and my question
was imprecisely worded.
> > Hadn't thought about it, honestly. What could I do, if I wished?
>
> Don't buy from him, every chance you get.
Heck, I've already been doing that. I'm glad to support the team!
Haven't you read the thread? :-)
Only the parts in OT.debate. You know where I hang out, after all...
> > I can head to Hawaii and give him the frowning of a lifetime. Who's with me!?!
>
> If you're buying, I'm flying. (1)
>
> 1 - Never been there, they tell me it's nice.
Never been there either, but I've worn their shirts and sampled their punch.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
| (...) On the legal definition of insider trading as it stands, today, in the US. That's the last I'll say about it in this thread, start a new thread if you want. (...) Don't buy from him, every chance you get. Haven't you read the thread? :-) (...) (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
