Subject:
|
Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 May 2004 18:57:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1064 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy Rear wrote:
> It could be very possible that this person works for Maersk in Hawaii, or knows
> someone who works for Maersk, or contacted Maersk directly (having an "in" with
> the company) to obtain the ships.
>
> Not to defend this person, but these are possibilities.
Indeed they are. Which is why I asked that LEGO look into it. (asked, mind you)
And later posted that I have reason to believe they are looking into it.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
| (...) Might this seem like a form of insider trading? If LEGO has facilitated this process in defiance of its stated ordering limits, then cleary they're at fault. But what if the seller has found a non-publicly-disclosed means of acquiring numerous (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
| (...) It could be very possible that this person works for Maersk in Hawaii, or knows someone who works for Maersk, or contacted Maersk directly (having an "in" with the company) to obtain the ships. Not to defend this person, but these are (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
