Subject:
|
Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 May 2004 19:34:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1114 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
>
> > Might this seem like a form of insider trading?
>
> Not really, because I support insider trading. All trading is insider trading,
> actually.
That's an interesting assertion, though I'd have to differ. On what do you base
it?
> > Out of curiosity, if the seller has these sets in hand (through legal means)
> > then what, if anything, can LEGO do about it?
>
> Nothing. You, however, can do something about it, if you wish.
Hadn't thought about it, honestly. What could I do, if I wished?
I can head to Hawaii and give him the frowning of a lifetime. Who's with me!?!
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
| (...) On the legal definition of insider trading as it stands, today, in the US. That's the last I'll say about it in this thread, start a new thread if you want. (...) Don't buy from him, every chance you get. Haven't you read the thread? :-) (...) (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
