 | | "regulating Liberals" —Scott Arthur
| | | | (...) ...and this comes from the same person who (URL) said>: "to advocate complete freedom without responsibility is to be an Anarchist, not a freedom-lover" Scott A (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "regulating Liberals" —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Not sure what you are saying here. When I said "responsibility", I meant personal responsibility. As I have stated elsewhere, Freedom without morality is doomed. I don't need an amoral government to be my conscience. JOHN (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: "regulating Liberals" —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) What if your countrymen shirk that "responsibility"? (...) But you welcome one which reflects your own narrow moral views? Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
