 | | disturbing ideas —Scott Arthur
| | | | (...) St Ronnie was not the sharpest stick in the pile when elected! (...) Do you reject the Balfour declaration which sought the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”? (...) I've heard disturbing ideas from both both (...) (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: disturbing ideas —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Funny, I was a Liberal during the Reagan years, and used to think the exact same thing. Now on the other side I see how that that characterization was Liberal spin, just as Liberals assertion of Bush being a "moron". It is partisan hacktalk. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: disturbing ideas —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) Actions speak louder than words: Bush is no intellectual. (...) OK. So Palestine did exist then? (...) Why should I? (...) Why? The status of Jerusalem under international law is clear. Scott A (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
