|
|
 | | Re: Richard Clarke
|
| (...) Strange that O'Neil also said that Bush took his eye off the ball. (...) Clarke is clear that he thought OBL was a problem... Bush did not want to hear. (...) That does not answer my point... is throw mud all you can do? (...) Anything to say? (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: FOUND: Weapons of Mass Destruction
|
| (...) But if they'd posed a threat to, say, Cuba instead of to the United States, would they have been arrested at all? And, anyway, that's not the point. All day, every day, we're bombarded with so-called "breaking news" reports about the latest (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: FOUND: Weapons of Mass Destruction
|
| (...) First of all, nobody with the knowledge of what they were up to was "allowing" them to live in the US. As soon as they were discovered, they were arrested. (...) Is this last part meant as a joke? Are you inferring some sort of aspersion on (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | FOUND: Weapons of Mass Destruction
|
| From Dubya's own carefully fact-checked SOTU (URL) address:> As part of the offensive against terror, we are also confronting the regimes that harbor and support terrorists, and could supply them with nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. I've (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Richard Clarke
|
| (...) Not if he is kissing Democrats. (...) More like CYA. (...) That's my point! It was HIS job to get that perception, and way back then! (...) If nothing else he should shut his piehole or take some responsibility instead of trying to profit and (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
