To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23412
23411  |  23413
Subject: 
Re: Is Nader really a threat to Democracy?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:32:54 GMT
Viewed: 
290 times
  
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message
news:4039AC44.FA1D7E0A@vfaq.com...
Once again, Ralph Nader is shooting for the impossible, and once again
(hopefully NOT, this time, as people will remember last time), he will
take votes from the Dems, possibly putting GWB back into office.

If you look at the two states where the Bush/Gore decision was narrow,
you'll find that even if Nader hadn't run, the non-Dem non-Rep votes for
fringe candidates would have put Gore over the top.

It seems typical that the Dems. (or Reps. for that matter) lay claim to all
non-major party votes.

The fact is that in the upcoming election, I could vote for the party that
brought me "The Digital Millennium Copyright Act", or the party that brought
me "The Patriot Act".

...or I could vote for a party that actually represents my views.

If more people took the time to learn about the other parties, they might
find one that met their views better - instead of sucking up republicrat
nonsense about how the two parties platforms are so vastly different.

I don't want Bush in office.  I don't want Kerry in office.  I don't really
want Nader in office, but of those three he's the only candidate I haven't
ruled out.  A vote for Nader (or any fringe candidate) is a vote against a
two party system.

The Dems. need to face the music though.  If they can't beat Bush in an
election, they need to reconsider their platform to appeal to a wider array
of Americans.  They already have one strike against them - and so far
they're on track to nominate another dud.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Is Nader really a threat to Democracy?
 
(...) Get real. You're deluding yourself. A vote for Nader at this point is *a vote for Bush*. Keep voting indirectly for Bush. But don't whine if GWB gets reelected and continues hauling the US into a decline that may take decades to reverse. I (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Is Nader really THAT stupid, or just a secret lapdog of GWB?
 
Once again, Ralph Nader is shooting for the impossible, and once again (hopefully NOT, this time, as people will remember last time), he will take votes from the Dems, possibly putting GWB back into office. Sometimes I wonder if he's on GWB's (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

12 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR