Subject:
|
Re: Commanche helicopter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:36:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
239 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
-snip-
|
|
Also check out this great
BBC article. And
yes, I know the BBC is biased, but I think this article is worth a read.
|
What makes you say that?
|
I take that back actually. I am just cautious when I talk about the BBC. Come
you, even you have to admit that their reporting of Gulf War II, and the fallout
from it, was biased. Furthermore, they do have a way of sounding condescending
when talking about North America, especially anything the USA does militarily.
Thus quoting them as a source on why the Comanche is cancelled almost seems
too easy.
I mean, just read this and try not to cringe:
On the face of it, it should have found favour with the US Defence Secretary,
Donald Rumsfeld - it was small, agile and stealthy.
:-D
Take care Scott,
Mladen
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Commanche helicopter
|
| (...) I was trying real hard not to post. But this is outright laughable. When you say that the BBC is/was biased, are you taking into account that pretty much throughout the whole recent war in Iraq a full ONE THIRD of the *American public* (...) (21 years ago, 25-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|