|
|
 | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) You're almost right here, but you're doing things in the wrong order. Heal the sick people of their neuroses first. Then strike down the no longer needed laws designed to protect them from the consequences of these neuorses. (...) How can you (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: jj: only in america?
|
| (...) And not only that, but it was home-cooked and not McDonald's! (the shame) (...) Touche;-) (...) I'm sure it won't be for the lack of trying;-) JOHN (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) It is improbable, but not impossible. Surely, the key must then be that you should have the respect of your kids before you encounter your extreme life-or-death scenario? We don’t share the same culture or kids, but for me beating children is (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Your misunderstanding me. I'm not saying that I should wake up tomorrow and all the laws regarding marriage will be stricken from the books. Just as cutting off one's arm to stem a minor infection would be bad, so to would instantainiously (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) OK. I think you're right... hacking isn't the right approach for the "final answer". however, as a hacker myself, there's value in hacking. If a few states go through various permutations on this (Ohio, I hear is about to do a very restrictive (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
