 | | Hallowed by his name —Dave Schuler
|
| | | Particularly objectionable to Reagan's sycophants was (URL) CBS's> choice not to include the scene in which the sacrosanct former President multiplied the loaves and fishes, nor the part in which he created the world in six days. No doubt The (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Hallowed by his name, part II —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Further efforts at deification are discussed (URL) here.> Note that Souder isn't trying to oust Washington or Lincoln but is instead hoping to replace The New Deal President with the very icon of corporate politics. Dave! (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Hallowed be his name, part III —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) His corpse isn't even cold yet, and already (URL) opportunists are circling.> Other initiatives include an Amendment to the Constitution enshrining Reagan as The Greatest Human of All Time, the placing of statues in His image in every public (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shallow be his name, part III —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I heard Bush intends to rename himself "(URL) Bonzo>". (...) Did Bonzo not prevent much of those files from being (URL) published>? Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hallowed be his name, part III —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | (...) This is absolutely the most absurd statement I have ever read here on LUGNET! Your memory must be as bad as Ollie North's. I can still vividly remember the outrage that I felt watching North's congressional testimony about Iran/Contra. His (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Hallowed be his name, part III —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm curious as to why you thought that this assertion, of all of them, was serious! Aren't you more worried about the mandatory renaming of firstborn sons? (...) You're related to our current president? That's so cool! Dave! (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Hallowed be his name, part III —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | | (...) My bad. I think I need to adjust the settings on my sarcasm filter. (Sorry for the misinterpretation!) The whole putting Reagan on the dollar reminds me of the push to add him to Mt. Rushmore back when he left office. (...) And I keep telling (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Hallowed be his name, part III —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) No harm done--it gave me quite a chuckle, actually! (...) Nice! Dave! (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hallowed be his name, part III —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Ronald Wilson Schuler has a nice ring to it... Chris (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hallowed be his name, part III —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Yikes! He'd have to be Ronald Wilson Schuler the 3rd, then--both my father and I are first-born sons, too! Dave! (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
