Subject:
|
Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:26:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
88 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> http://nationalreview.com/comment/payne200310300739.asp
>
> Mr. Henry Payne's problem in this otherwise well written essay (living in MI I
> can attest to the truth of much of what he says) is that in proving the Dems to
> be pikers yet again, he feels that it follows without proof that the GOP is
> therefore good.
Without commenting on the article on the whole (since it deals in matter that I
haven't researched), I note with interest that Mr. Payne is among the bunch that
loves to credit a Republican President for economic recovery while blaming
economic troubles on the previous Democrat. In itself that doesn't invalidate
anything else that he says, but it's disheartening to see him perpetuate a
fallacy (while the website at large whores itself for Conservative dogma and
Reagan deification--very nice).
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
| (URL) Henry Payne's problem in this otherwise well written essay (living in MI I can attest to the truth of much of what he says) is that in proving the Dems to be pikers yet again, he feels that it follows without proof that the GOP is therefore (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
