 | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) That's true, and more than once I went to great lengths to make the point crystal clear too, with lots of historical references: (URL) 2nd Amendment -- Bare Bones> And gee, that cite is not even that old...last year. I find it annoying when a (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) It hasn't been amply settled. You are not a well regulated militia by any standard of those words. It's a point you consitently avoid--you and others cut right to the "the rights of the people to own guns shall not be infringed" Further, you (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Did you even read that cite again? Read the whole 3 message thread please: **From Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia: POSSE COMITATUS. These Latin words signify the power of the county. Or yet again in other words: the power of (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) And we discussed this before--and you added addendums to the idea of "whole people" to not include those that are too young, old, infirm, or mentally unstable. Did you also stop to consider that, in context of the day and age, that "whole (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Not at all. You would be 100% correct as to the meaning at the time of ratification. But collectively, the 13th and 14th Amendment gave freed slaves the status of Freemen. Knowing precisely what that meant, many freed slaves had to obtain guns (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) This has nothing to do with morality. It has everything to do with your selective interpretation. Either the 2nd is archaic, for you do not supply militia members as needed from 'the people' anymore, the people who join the militia today are (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) What does my opposition to a standing army have to do with the need, or right, to a militia? The militia is de facto -- it is the people themselves. There is no wiggling. I am not telling you that we are currently doing things in strict (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) I agree if there were laws or even constitutional rights that caused the deaths of innocent life I would be all for removing them too. Of course removing the right of law abiding citizens to have weapons does not reduce the crime rate, even (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
