 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) This is because it takes "faith" to NOT believe in God because you have to have faith in such fatally flawed teachings as evolution,etc. or regarding whatever other theories you have about what got us here. (...) I don't know what dictionary (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) When a conservative uses the term "traditional family", I believe that they are referring to a 1 male, 1 women married household. This model can be traced all the way back to the teaching of Jesus. Number of kids is inconsequential; (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) Fair enough. How about this: The idea of a happy, non-dysfunctional, financially secure, single-income, white, Christian family with at least one son and one daughter, and often with a grandparent in residence. If you look at almost any (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) Clarification on what you mean exactly by the term "traditional family" would be appreciated, Dave! JOHN (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) I would suggest that the common (in the US) notion of the "traditional family" hardly ever existed at all except on TV and in the blurry nostalgia of the people. And I agree that we'd all be a lot better off if that insidious fiction were (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|