Subject:
|
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:19:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1032 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
I would suggest that the common (in the US) notion of the “traditional
family” hardly ever existed at all except on TV and in the blurry nostalgia
of the people.
And I agree that we’d all be a lot better off if that insidious fiction were
abandoned.
|
Clarification on what you mean exactly by the term “traditional family” would
be appreciated, Dave!
|
Fair enough. How about this: The idea of a happy, non-dysfunctional,
financially secure, single-income, white, Christian family with at least one son
and one daughter, and often with a grandparent in residence. If you look at
almost any family-based publications (cookbooks, appliance instructions,
Reader’s Digest, etc.) in the US from post-WWII through about 1970, you’ll see
an overwhelming preference for this family model, with the perhaps notable
exception of My Three Sons.
Anyway, since I’m merely quoting the term that is endlessly reused by
Conservative agenda-pushers, I make no apology for failing to define it with
razor-sharp clarity. Instead, I would ask those Conservatives to define the
term and to identify when, exactly, the “traditional family” existed as they
claim it to have existed.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
