To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22385
22384  |  22386
Subject: 
Re: God's Nature
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:31:19 GMT
Viewed: 
591 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
   You’re so far gone, there is no way to reply to that. No matter what I might state next you will insist that you can “interpret” the Bible in such a way as to reveal either an error in it, or in my interpretation of it.

Blinkered Bigot! The Bible is not a factual document; it is a book of faith!

   Everyone get that? The Bible means whatever John Neal says it means.

Hypocrite! Everyone get that? The Bible means whatever (the atheist) Richard Marchetti says it means.

   The language is fairly straight-forward there, John.

The Bible, especially the OT, is anything but straight-forward. It cannot be read like the New York Times.

   Are you going to claim a translatory error? I am all ears. This claim that you know what it means over and above its obvious meaning is a little over the top for this forum.

Again:
“And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword.”

Funny that repitition too, where it keeps highlighting that point again and again -- how every man, woman, child, and beast was destroyed.

I guess that’s God’s love for ya...

You are an idiot at exegesis, and don’t know what you are talking about.

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: God's Nature
 
(...) Let's make things nice and sparkling clear shall we? You said: "Our God is not the same God of people who murder women and children in His name. If you call that close-minded, so be it." (URL) I showed that the first statement is false on it's (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: God's Nature
 
You're so far gone, there is no way to reply to that. No matter what I might state next you will insist that you can "interpret" the Bible in such a way as to reveal either an error in it, or in my interpretation of it. Everyone get that? The Bible (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR