To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22122
22121  |  22123
Subject: 
Re: Sticking my gun where it doesn't belong...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:48:34 GMT
Viewed: 
428 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   60 percent of the violent deaths in your country in the year 2000, according to this website were due to *just* firearms. That leaves 40 percent for all other forms of violent death combined, including knives, axes, rope, baseball bats, and let’s not ferget driving over spouses with vehicles.

So what?

All you’ve done is show that people are smart enough to use the best tool for a certain task -- if you intend to kill someone a gun is a good choice for that job. In a sense, if you could eliminate a person’s motivation to kill you would reduce the murder rate, regardless of the advent of guns. Sadly, people do like to kill themselves and each other.

Why is that? What in your society, supposedly the freeest society on the planet, causes you to kill each other more often, per capita, than any other country in the world during peace time? I’ll go so far as to grant you the premise that if you can change your fellow ‘Merican’s mindset about killing each other, then by all means, keep the gun in your house. But that’s not going to happen--you’re not going to change your fellow citizens minds, especially when you have high ideals like ‘outta my cold dead hands’ and ‘lead in the brain’ as your mantras. So get the objects that cause the harm, and, hopefully, the mindset will change. If you don’t have access to cigarettes, you can’t smoke ‘em. And if you can’t smoke ‘em, you can’t die because of ‘em.

  
What about the traffic? Why does the fact that it’s largely accidental not cause you any worries? I mean, I did mean it as a joke but it does have it’s serious side.


I would say that all the difference in the world lies between the concept of “Accident” and “Violent homicide” and if you can’t distinguish between those two happenings, then you’ve lost any credibility you’ve had left.

   BTW, how many people die of firearm incidents that might have otherwise have been non-lethal but for the absense of a national healthcare system and/or adequately speedy medical treatment for the victim? I find that an interesting question. I am trying to distinguish people that are dead on the spot from those that die of some other complication even if it’s just bleeding to death.


And I could point to a few countries that have national helth care systems and such, that, for all intents and purposes, are getting along pretty well--but that’s another mind-shift that Americans won’t grasp--socialist ideas do not automatically imply ‘communism’.

   If I were to ever kill someone, which generally would never happen unless I was somehow forced to it, I would go for the incapacitating chest shot and then the many shots to lethal locations like the head and heart. Efficiency is my middle name...

I’d say is ‘gun-toting-yahoo’ with the ‘incapacitating chest shot, then the many shots to lethal locations’, but that’s just me.

  
-- Hop-Frog

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Sticking my gun where it doesn't belong...
 
(...) Well lets see... According to that site only 0.00004 percent of people decide to abuse freedom by killing others with guns. And only 0.00006 percent of people decide to kill themselves with guns. So in the "supposedly freeest society" only (...) (21 years ago, 18-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Sticking my gun where it doesn't belong...
 
(...) So what? All you've done is show that people are smart enough to use the best tool for a certain task -- if you intend to kill someone a gun is a good choice for that job. In a sense, if you could eliminate a person's motivation to kill you (...) (21 years ago, 18-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

111 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR