Subject:
|
Re: PRIORITY TRANSMISSION
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 06:50:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
193 times
|
| |
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message
news:HLCGG1.y1w@lugnet.com...
> I'm with Mike P.
>
> What exactly is the excuse for not web-optimizing these very fuzzy images • in the
> first place? It takes like 1 minute to do (even though I screwed up my • naming
> convention on the last image). The new versions of these images are • something
> around 280 kb. total and about the same quality as the original at approx. • 575
> kb total. It could have been even more concise if I had resized the • images and
> not just optimized them at their current size -- smaller could have been • even
> faster with no significant loss in quality/detail.
>
> If you aren't web-optimizing images, you are totally being a high speed
> connection snob. I feel sure that there must be reasonably inexpensive • software
> that will handle it. And isn't Mark S. in design or something?
>
> -- Hop-Frog
This is stuff you'd have to ask Mark, but I know the only group he reads is
.space so he probably didn't see this. The only reason I did is because I'm
a newsticker junkie.
[ j o n ]
http://zemi.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: PRIORITY TRANSMISSION
|
| (3 URLs) I'm with Mike P. What exactly is the excuse for not web-optimizing these very fuzzy images in the first place? It takes like 1 minute to do (even though I screwed up my naming convention on the last image). The new versions of these images (...) (21 years ago, 17-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
