 | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) It is obvious you have never seen people beaten down by their socio-economic cicumstances as I have. Come to West Oakland, CA and see the situation and tell me that people are absolutely choosing their lifestyles. Now who is being naive? As an (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) You defend the more Christian approach? You make me laugh. Your idea is to have the government try and solve the problem, wasting billions of $$$ on beaucracy. How many trillions of dollars have we spent in the past 40 years on welfare (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Nobody mentioned welfare except for you, John. I emphasized decent education and trade programs. I don't see that you rebutted anything else substantive that I have previously stated either. You set up a straw man and want me to defend it? Not (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) I feel obliged to add that we probably haven't spent "trillions" of dollars on welfare unless of course we include the ongoing billions handed to big corporations, and that doesn't really qualify as 'trying to wipe out poverty.' Further, even (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
