 | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —David Koudys
|
| | | (...) They were bad. Do I celebrate *anyone's* death? No. Do I put "..seriously thought that the death of those two rat b***ards..." No. I think that justice would be served if the couple in St Kitts were put to death, but I would not celebrate it. (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) I was referring to your partisan liberalness. (...) I think you are unaware of how liberal your ideas actually are. I know I'm conservative; I'd bet you think you are pretty moderate... (...) No (thanks to the Israelis). Your refusal to come (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | (...) And the memory loss from the right must have the same short-life: the inspections were there to confirm the known WMD had been destroyed, and logic says what was destroyed can no longer be found. Can you prove those WMD were not destroyed? (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) And yet you still keep on missing the point--you didn't give the inspectors this long to do their job--doing their job without the support and 'proof' that you "Mericans supposedly had, btw, (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
